Quantopian's community platform is shutting down. Please read this post for more information and download your code.
Back to Community
Will Quantopian get better short modeling?

This topic was already discussed last year when we were told that it is not a top priority.

I really can not understand how can any long-short algorithm be accepted for the fund when the quantitative inaccuracy of its short positions is going to be substantial. Just yesterday I observed one of the stocks from QTradebleStocksUS() universe - the one used for the contest - have a borrow rate of 23%. The stock in question is SRNE and 23% borrow fee is a huge headwind the algorithm will face in the real world - the other ones being short liquidity, short sale restriction and other rules. These are hard to model, so at least some way to assign 'a short sale fee' would be a good start.

2 responses

@Vladimir,

My thoughts on this is that the things you've listed might be more applicable to retail traders trading via retail brokers. I believe Q trades via a Prime Broker, which depending on the terms they've negotiated (in general, the bigger the fund and the more you trade, the better the terms), might have a lot lower (possibly negligible, net rebates) borrow costs and a lot more long inventory available, including ability to borrow 'hard to borrow' stocks inter-broker if needed (at a cost of course). The default Q slippage (and commission) model I believe is quite aggressive as well, at least for liquid stocks, which on average might even-out higher borrowing costs not accurately modeled.

Also, while this may not be a high priority for Q, one great thing about Zipline being open-source is that anyone can contribute and add a better borrow cost model if someone has it as a higher priority, e.g. for retail trading.

Well said. I guess the unknowns regarding dealing with a prime broker is really the issue here. Anyone here had any exposure to them to comment about how it changes the playing field?