I was wondering what a "good" range was for sortino ratio. I ran an algorithm for past two years and got 5.34 is this decent?
I was wondering what a "good" range was for sortino ratio. I ran an algorithm for past two years and got 5.34 is this decent?
It is probably too good to be true.
When you compute downside deviation, you begin by summing (r_i - r_0)^2 for all r_i < r_0, where r_i are your daily returns and r_0 is the risk-free rate. Did you then divide by the total number of days, or the total number of days when r_i < r_0? In the former case, you will get Sortino ratios about 40% larger on average than the latter case. People do it both ways.
Even with the 40% boost, 5.34 is not a credible ex ante Sortino ratio for an unlevered low or moderate frequency equity strategy. My guesses are it's a calculation error, or it was data-mined, or it uses unrealistic execution assumptions.
It's easy to find strategies with ex post 5.34 and higher Sortino ratios over two years. Individual stocks often have them.
To answer your question, a solid long-term backtest of an unlevered, low frequency equity strategy showing a Sortino ratio above one, after adjusting for data mining, and based on solid economic fundamentals, would be considered very good. A two year Sortino of any number, especially without adjustment or economics, would not be impressive.