The overnight gap strategy (mean reversion of the overnight price gap) is well known and in this example I wanted to quantify the alpha associated with it. The alpha is huge but is that easy to trade it?
The overnight gap strategy (mean reversion of the overnight price gap) is well known and in this example I wanted to quantify the alpha associated with it. The alpha is huge but is that easy to trade it?
Note that I used FixedSlippage, so there is no volume limitation in the orders. This is just for fun, I wanted to see huge numbers.
@Luca,
Thanks for posting this...always interesting to see your work!
Couldn't resist mucking with this a bit...didn't actually change much, if anything, except for running it for the past two years, which is my pavlovian version of Q-normalization!
Here is my take:
GOOD NEWS:
Fantastic results as measured by cumulative returns!...>49%/2 years
BAD NEWS:
Pretty much ZERO risk factors, except for ~200% turnover each day!
Hmmm. why is this bad you might ask...well bad for me in that now I don't trust that this simulator(backtester) is set up at all to handle intraday trading,
hence, I don't trust the GOOD NEWS of high cumulative returns without a lot more work and validation, especially in the commisions&slippage areas.
I suppose that High Frequency Traders have figured all this out, yet I don't currently trust Zipline in the intraday sphere.
Love to be wrong here...as I really like those returns!
alan