Quantopian's community platform is shutting down. Please read this post for more information and download your code.
Back to Community
Quantopian Open: One Races to the Finish Line, Another Starting Gun Goes Off

Tomorrow we're closing out the February edition of the Quantopian Open. When the market closes, we'll sharpen our pencils, crunch the numbers, and see who won. The leaderboard is full of excitement. In the last few days Grant passed Kyu, and has closed in on Schäfer, with only 2/3 of a point separation. It's still anybody's game - if the market moves on Friday, the whole top 10 might get re-shuffled.

We're on target to start trading the winner's algorithm on Monday with $100,000 of real money. Make sure you check back on Monday - we're going to have a nifty new screen where you can see the winner's prize money tracked minute-to-minute as his algorithm does the work.

On Monday, we're kicking off the March edition of the Quantopian Open. Everyone who has placed an entry so far, and everyone who places their entry before market open (9:30 EST) on Monday, will be competing to manage another $100,000. This edition of the contest will end on March 31, after 22 trading days. The March contest is running with the same rule set and judging criteria as the February one did. One big improvement for March is that soon we will permit the corporate fundamental data in your contest entries.

I encourage everyone to get an algo running in the contest! It costs you nothing, and I assure you that you will learn from watching your algorithm run against live data. Backtesting and paper trading are very different in practice, and you need experience doing both in order to become a good algorithmic trader.

If you don't manage to get an algorithm into the contest by Monday, all is not lost. Everyone who enters an algorithm after Monday's deadline will be entered into the April edition of the contest.

We plan on making a scoring change in the April edition. As several people here in the Quantopian community have noted, it's possible to "curve-fit" your backtest for a good backtest score, and that doesn't work for making a good algorithm in the long run. To prevent that strategy from being effective, and even more importantly to encourage good algorithm writing, we're going to add a new scoring factor. We're going to compare the algorithm's backtest performance to the paper trading performance. The bigger the difference between the two tests, the bigger the penalty. Sometime during March we're going to start publishing that penalty factor and how we're computing it in the daily leaderboard CSV. We look forward to your feedback on the scoring change and will use that feedback to shape the new rule for April.

Disclaimer

The material on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation or endorsement for any security or strategy, nor does it constitute an offer to provide investment advisory services by Quantopian. In addition, the material offers no opinion with respect to the suitability of any security or specific investment. No information contained herein should be regarded as a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action as none of Quantopian nor any of its affiliates is undertaking to provide investment advice, act as an adviser to any plan or entity subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity, or give advice in a fiduciary capacity with respect to the materials presented herein. If you are an individual retirement or other investor, contact your financial advisor or other fiduciary unrelated to Quantopian about whether any given investment idea, strategy, product or service described herein may be appropriate for your circumstances. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Quantopian makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the views expressed in the website. The views are subject to change, and may have become unreliable for various reasons, including changes in market conditions or economic circumstances.

10 responses

To clarify we should expect that our contest entries can use fundamental data for the April contest? But for March we should still primarily use CSV/price data?

Congrats Grant!
That was a photo finish!
Ajay

Well done, Grant!

Congrats Grant!

Disclaimer

The material on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation or endorsement for any security or strategy, nor does it constitute an offer to provide investment advisory services by Quantopian. In addition, the material offers no opinion with respect to the suitability of any security or specific investment. No information contained herein should be regarded as a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action as none of Quantopian nor any of its affiliates is undertaking to provide investment advice, act as an adviser to any plan or entity subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity, or give advice in a fiduciary capacity with respect to the materials presented herein. If you are an individual retirement or other investor, contact your financial advisor or other fiduciary unrelated to Quantopian about whether any given investment idea, strategy, product or service described herein may be appropriate for your circumstances. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Quantopian makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the views expressed in the website. The views are subject to change, and may have become unreliable for various reasons, including changes in market conditions or economic circumstances.

Thanks all. Should be fun. Looking forward to the "nifty new screen where you can see the winner's prize money tracked minute-to-minute." I've never been on a game show... --Grant

Grant, very well deserved! Congrats! Here's your name in lights: https://www.quantopian.com/winners

Disclaimer

The material on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation or endorsement for any security or strategy, nor does it constitute an offer to provide investment advisory services by Quantopian. In addition, the material offers no opinion with respect to the suitability of any security or specific investment. No information contained herein should be regarded as a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action as none of Quantopian nor any of its affiliates is undertaking to provide investment advice, act as an adviser to any plan or entity subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity, or give advice in a fiduciary capacity with respect to the materials presented herein. If you are an individual retirement or other investor, contact your financial advisor or other fiduciary unrelated to Quantopian about whether any given investment idea, strategy, product or service described herein may be appropriate for your circumstances. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Quantopian makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the views expressed in the website. The views are subject to change, and may have become unreliable for various reasons, including changes in market conditions or economic circumstances.

Grant, prepare for the GS and JPM recruiters to start calling...

AutomatedTrader: Quantopian awards finance industry outsider $100,000 to manage for 6 months

Thanks Market Tech. I'd been keeping an eye out for such a press release. I'm sure I would not survive the first five minutes of an interview at GS or JPM, and I'm not interested anyway. As far as being interested in becoming a Quantopian fund "manager" I'm awaiting further details. I gather that if my Quantopian-funded algo doesn't fall flat, the algo would be a candidate for the fund. If it turns out that Q would just keep funding it in some fashion, great! But if the level of effort gets cranked up to the point where it would interfere with personal and professional obligations, then it would not be so attractive. To me, the term "manager" connotes a highly active role, so until it is defined in this context, I'm on the fence. There's also the issue of needing to have "skin in the game" which has not been sorted out yet, either. Or maybe this concept has been dropped?

Grant

Well done Grant!