So here's this strategy I spent a couple of hours laboriously curve-fitting (minute backtesting is so fun!). I tuned it to approach the 3.0 leverage limit, with specific securities that I'd picked (from a set of about 20). If I wait, like @Grant proposes, until the very end of the Open submission window, and the market collapses dragging the other participants down, it is plausible that this strat could rise to the top of the pack. Unlikely, though, I realize.
Would I ever trade this strat? No way! It's got HIGH RISK in big letters stamped all over it.
Narrow instruments selection.
Highly leveraged (have we learned nothing in the last 7 years? Lehman Bros., AIG, FXCM, Alpari...)
Short term test in stunning bull market.
What would I do to make this strat reasonable?
No leverage.
Minimum of 10, dynamically selected instruments traded during the life of a 2 year test.
Minimum of 3 months real time paper trading.
Eliminate all magic number inputs, replacing them with calculated inputs based on the market as a whole.
Now, this is not to say that the top algos on the leader board are not up-and-up and excellent examples of broad instrument selection and risk management, I'm sure they all are. But this attached example, in part, alludes to the possible gameability of the Q-Open.