Quantopian's community platform is shutting down. Please read this post for more information and download your code.
Back to Community
Getting Better Fills than 'Live Trading'?

Can someone explain this ?

I've been trading the signals generated by an algo 'Live Trading' on Quantopian, and consistently get better fills than the paper trading simulation. This is creating tracking error as my portfolio is typically carrying more exposure than the paper simulation.

The algo leans heavily into illiquid / small caps, so I would have assumed that the slippage would be to the reverse. I'm currently using the below slippage parameters - are there any useful heuristics on how to adjust the volume limit? Does the slippage model even apply to the live trading simulation?

set_slippage(slippage.VolumeShareSlippage(volume_limit=.20, price_impact=0.0))  

The algo is placing limit orders, so I've kept the price impact at 0.

Thanks!

1 response

I've never trusted the slippage model on illiquid stocks. I believe Charles Witt ran into issues with unmarketable limit orders, or something like that on one of his algorithms that traded penny stocks.

I only trade very liquid stocks and just set slippage to fixed 0.00 as the bid/ask is normally a penny.

Not sure how to help on illiquid stocks.