Team,
quick question. Doing backtest for one of my strategies to determine if my approach is valid or completely flawed.
I do backtesting for last 1 year and if model is fine then I do backtest for last 7 years.
If model shows it worked well for last 7 years then I consider it valid.
I know this is in contradiction to the theory where you have to first do tests for the past period and then verify with future data sets.
What would be difference in this case?
Any feedback is appreciated.
thanks in advance